RE: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration

2003-09-25 Thread Soliman Hesham
Also you might want to consider the discussions on: - Address resolution on p2p links - Clarifying the meaning of the M and O bits - Other MIP related discussions Hesham > -Original Message- > From: Pekka Savola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 1:25 AM >

Re: Updates to Neighbor Discovery and Stateless Autoconfiguration

2003-09-25 Thread Pekka Savola
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Brian Haberman wrote: > One of our charter items is to produce updates of > RFC 2461 and 2462 in order to progress them to Draft Standard. > As a part of that effort, I would like to bring to the Work > Group's attention, some work that has been done in SEND. > > http://w

[I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-01.txt]

2003-09-25 Thread Bob Hinden
At 07:09 AM 9/24/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP Version 6 Working Group Working Group of the IETF. Title : Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses Author(s)

RE: why market picked up NATs [Re: Writeups on why RFC1918 is bad?]

2003-09-25 Thread Bob Hinden
Michel, If not indiscrete, how many IPv4 addresses and how much $$$ are we talking about? Given the number of hosts I have on my home setup (I need a /27) the only realistic option I have to run NAT-free is to bring in a T1 (as no reliable residential broadband provider is willing to give me a /27