Måns,
> Måns Nilsson wrote:
> I have a small-business-grade DSL at home, costing around
> 5 times as much as consumer (and that is with the discaount!),
Sounds about right with a discount.
> but I get a /27 and RFC2317 style delegation. It is bliss,
> but it should not be exceptional, it should
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Lutz Pressler wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Andrew White wrote:
> > >
> > > The real issue is application support. In the consumer market, OS X has
> > > IPv6, but it's hidden from most users. Win XP also has IPv6, but it
> >
--On Wednesday, September 24, 2003 08:41:14 -0700 Michel Py
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I had been living in bliss
>
> A too common problem within the IETF. Maybe it would be useful for some
> people here to actually get out in the real world.
We more typically escape to bliss, at a cost, be
--On Tuesday, September 23, 2003 16:41:16 -0400 Margaret Wasserman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd be happy to dust off my sl-impact draft, and update it based
> on the feedback I've received so far, if folks think that would be
> useful...
Yes, please do.
--
Måns NilssonSystems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>
>> > True, but if we wish to remain relevant, something has to be written
>> > somewhere. I fully agree that doing so in *this* document may not
>> be
>> > worth it; it might be worth it in some other doc, e.g. sl-impact.
>>
>> I agree with Pekka.
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Antonio Querubin wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Andrew White wrote:
> >
> > The real issue is application support. In the consumer market, OS X has
> > IPv6, but it's hidden from most users. Win XP also has IPv6, but it
> > requires a bunch of chicanery to get it working. The
