Hi all,
I've just sent in the Node Requirements doc for publication. Until
it is announced, it can be found here:
http://www-nrc.nokia.com/sua/draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-06.txt
I've tried to answer all of Thomas' comments, so I hope it is now
ready for IETF last call.
thanks,
John
On 24 okt 2003, at 18:14, Hans Kruse wrote:
2. Several folks stumbled over the wording (in section 1.0) that
applications may treat these address[sic] like global scoped
addresses. How about:
Applications may treat these addresses like global scoped addresses;
such applications will function
Exactly. Either we put this solution on the standards track,
eliminating many of the problems of both RFC 1918 and FEC0::/10,
and meeting a range of needs, or we continue searching for
the perfect solution. If we take the latter approach, we will
surely see PA space used for these needs instead,
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just sent in the Node Requirements doc for publication. Until
it is announced, it can be found here:
http://www-nrc.nokia.com/sua/draft-ietf-ipv6-node-requirements-06.txt
I've tried to answer all of Thomas' comments, so I hope it is now
If the IPv6 connectivity to those destinations
is poor while the IPv4 connectivity is better (i.e., the IPv6 traffic
experiences higher latency, lower throughput, or more lost packets
than IPv4 traffic), applications will still communicate over IPv6 at
the expense of network
Hi, all
Happy monday, begining of a new week.
I have just visited the project site (www.6power.org)
and am very impressed. I agree that PLC would be a good
starting point for IPv6 deployment.
There are some domestic PLC manufacturers also here in Korea,
but not yet interested in IPv6.
