The IESG has received a request from the IP Version 6 Working Group to
consider the following document:
- 'Management Information Base for the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)'
as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on t
All,
Attached is the latest agenda for the IPv6 WG meetings at
IETF 58. Please note that in order to accomodate some travel
schedules, there will be discussion of local-use addresses in
both sessions.
Regards,
Brian & Bob
IPv6 WG Chairs
Tuesday (11/11/03) 1700-1800
-
The IESG has received a request from the IP Version 6 Working Group to
consider the following document:
- 'Management Information Base for the Internet Protocol (IP) '
as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Alain Durand wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Alain,
Do you think it is better to let the RIRs develop a policy for
allocating PA space for local use, i.e. create a swamp like IPv4?
PA... Do you PI for Provider Independant?
If it is the case, yes I think
Geoff,
Geoff Huston wrote:
>
> Brian,
>
> In your note to Alain you pose the question:
>
> >Do you think it is better to let the RIRs develop a policy for
> >allocating PA space for local use, i.e. create a swamp like IPv4?
>
> It appears to me that you see this as being an either / or situati
Alain Durand wrote:
>
> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
> >Alain,
> >
> >Do you think it is better to let the RIRs develop a policy for
> >allocating PA space for local use, i.e. create a swamp like IPv4?
> >
> PA... Do you PI for Provider Independant?
> If it is the case, yes I think it would be less
