Hi,
well, the document seems like to completely concentrate on an
addressing-based solution model.. which it probably should not. Anyone
even glancing at the document can be 100% sure of this.
Or was it only supposed to be agnostic of whether local-use addressing was
needed? There's a
A packetization layer should set an ECN codepoint in
the packets it sends IFF it is also doing Packetization
Layer Path MTU Discovery (PLPMTUD) and is not
expecting to get ICMP's back from the network in
response to too-large packets being dropped.
Why overload the ECN bit this
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
9.09% | 13 | 13.20% | 110570 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10.49% | 15 | 8.87% |74285 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6.99% | 10 | 9.32% |78115 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.59% |8 | 4.85% |
