Hello,
Few comments on the unman-scenarios-03 draft.
CP
High-Level
--
1.
None of the cases consider a dual-stack gateway that is connected
to the ISP.
# [Host1]--v
# [Gateway]--[Gateway][ISP]
# [Host2]--^ |
#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Huitema wrote:
| So, what about a text such as:
|
| Several IETF documents mention site local addresses [RFC2772, RFC2894,
| RFC3082, RFC3111, RFC3142, RFC3177]. These mentions should be removed if
| and when these documents are updated. In
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| An unadministered PI scheme that generated unique prefixes would
satisfy the
| first 2 requirements. However, allowing such addresses to be globally
| routeable has two drawbacks:
| - affects global routing tables, possibly badly
| - raises
Please ignore. I was probably too tired to notice the incorrect To
address while sending it.
The mail has now been sent to its correct destination.
CP
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:51:22 +0530, Chirayu Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Hello,
Few comments on the unman-scenarios-03 draft.
CP
