On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Fred Templin wrote:
===
(f) Finally, in order to limit the bandwidth and forwarding costs
incurred sending ICMPv6 error messages, an IPv6 node MUST limit
the rate of ICMPv6 error messages it sends.
Fred,
I mostly agree with Pekka here.
Specific comments inline:
I think we may have glossed over this in earlier discussion,
but I believe
'B' should be allowed as an expression of either messages OR bytes.
Size *does* matter in certain cases, and expressing 'B'
only in terms
of a
Pekka Savola wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Fred Templin wrote:
===
(f) Finally, in order to limit the bandwidth and forwarding costs
incurred sending ICMPv6 error messages, an IPv6 node MUST limit
the rate of ICMPv6 error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with Pekka that this compllicates the text and the
implementation. Moreover, N (the long-term average) can be
in number of packets per seconds or a fraction of the attached
link's bandwidth. Don't you think, the size of the packet
will be covered if N is
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Fred Templin wrote:
Note: the decision whether or not to drop an incoming packet
can be made in packet mode, ignoring packet sizes, or in
byte mode, taking into account the size of the incoming
packet. The performance implications of the choice between
Pekka Savola wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Fred Templin wrote:
Note: the decision whether or not to drop an incoming packet
can be made in packet mode, ignoring packet sizes, or in
byte mode, taking into account the size of the incoming
packet. The performance implications of the
