I think this is vitally necessary and ready to go to the IESG.
If proof be needed, I heard yesterday something that I found extraordinary
until I thought about it. It seems that major companies considering
selling a division are now routinely renumbering the entire division into
Net 10 prior to
Brian,
Based on the analysis in my last message, I also agree with Pekka.
But, I would still prefer to see the rate limiting text include the term
messages/bytes instead of just messages. If it is too complicated
I'm just not seeing it; if it is problematic, that is a different story.
I'm
Brian Haberman wrote:
All,
This is the start of an IPv6 working group last call on:
Title : Unique Local IPv6 Unicast Addresses
Author(s) : R. Hinden, B. Haberman
Filename: draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-02.txt
Pages : 16
Christian Huitema wrote:
Locally assigned global IDs MUST be generated with a pseudo-random
algorithm consistent with [RANDOM].
I would have like to see some stronger wording to explain that, in the
self assigned case,
choosing FD00::/48 is a very bad idea.
The draft already says that
