RE: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes

2004-02-01 Thread Mukesh . Gupta
I agree with Christian and Pekka here. So I think, we mostly agree upon the text that I had sent out and I don't have to make any changes to that. > -Original Message- > From: ext Christian Huitema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 1:04 PM > To: Pekka Savola; ma

RE: Microsoft Security Resolution KB303663

2004-02-01 Thread Jeroen Massar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of TERESSA PROVOST > Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2004 11:04 AM > To: Ipv > Subject: Microsoft Security Resolution KB303663 This is ofcourse yet another virus(tm), with the new ultracool pick a pair

Learning a valid prefix (Re: ICMPv6: New destination unreachable codes)

2004-02-01 Thread Greg Daley
Hi Christian, I agree, Desination Unreachable is not the right place to put this information. I'll explain further below. Christian Huitema wrote: If I am not wrong, if we wanted the router to send the correct prefix to the host in the ICMP message, we will have to change the format of the ICMPv6

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt

2004-02-01 Thread Brian Haberman
Mike, C. M. Heard wrote: On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP Version 6 Working Group Working Group of the IETF. Title : IP Forwarding Table MIB Au

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2096-update-06.txt

2004-02-01 Thread C. M. Heard
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line > Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP > Version 6 Working Group Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : IP Forwarding Table MIB > Author(s) : M.