On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:00:25PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
(I hope you still remember this) during the wg last call for
draft-ietf-ipv6-scoping-arch-00.txt, you proposed to use the zone ID
value zero as the default with a higher requirement level:
[...]
And,
Brian,
Here is another small thing I just noticed:
inetCidrRouteIfIndex OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX InterfaceIndex
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
The ifIndex value which identifies the local interface
through
Pekka,
Thanks for the comments. I will respond to the substantial issues and
semi-editorial in your email. The editorial ones look fine and should be
to include them in the next version of the draft.
substantial
---
1) specifying just one allocator to the end-sites; this is always
Inline..
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Bob Hinden wrote:
The text in the IANA considerations section calls for the IANA to set up a
allocation authority for the centrally assigned ULA prefixes. The exact
details of how to do this (i.e., one or many organizations doing the
assignments, who it is,
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Version 6 Working Group Working Group of the IETF.
Title : IPv6 Host to Router Load Sharing
Author(s) : R. Hinden
Filename:
