> On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 22:08:28 -0700,
> "Christian Huitema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> >> Some people commented that we needed to clarify what's bad with the
>> >> M/O flags if we want to deprecate (or remove) them.
(folding a long line)
> The normal IETF practice is that when a docum
> >> Some people commented that we needed to clarify what's bad with the
> >> M/O flags if we want to deprecate (or remove) them.
The normal IETF practice is that when a document progresses from PS do DS and then to
standard, parts of the specification that are not actually present in
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
20.69% |6 | 18.63% |37590 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13.79% |4 | 16.16% |32615 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13.79% |4 | 9.13% |18422 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6.90% |2 | 10.37% |209
On 24-apr-04, at 7:46, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
>> You only discuss "what would break if we deprecate these flags". I
>> have
>> no problems with the text that follows, but I DO have a very big
>> problem with changing these flags. You can't just go around a
