Thanks for your good comments.
I agree with you at your two points.
Especially, number 2 is the opinion of your co-author, Suresh.
He will speak about your opinion.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Christian Huitema [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jaehoon Paul Jeong [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
A resolution was proposed along with the one for issue 275.
There has been no objection to the resolution, so I'm going
to close this issue. The resolution will appear in the next
revision of the draft.
IETF IPv6 working
Hello Yakhov,.
In the basic BGP draft, it is stated that multiple NLRIs can be carried in a
single update message only if their path attributes are similar
Section 3.1
.
Multiple routes that have the same path attributes can be advertised in
a single UPDATE message by
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, JINMEI Tatuya / [ISO-2022-JP] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
Assuming I'm correct for both the questions, I'd like to propose to
revise the logic in Section 5.5.3 as follows:
a) Check for the Autonomous flag
b) Ignore the link-local prefix
c) Check for the case of
