> On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 07:20:06 -0700 (PDT),
> Erik Nordmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> I first would like to know your opinion, if any, on my latest question
>> (in the separate message). If we choose option 1 (i.e., basically do
>> nothing on this), we still might want to clarify what
Hi,
Please be aware of a new draft from Erik, Nick and I.
Greg
---
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
Title : Tentative Source Link-Layer Address Options for IPv6
Neighbour Discovery
Author(s)
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IP Version 6 Working Group Working Group of the IETF.
Title : IP Version 6 over PPP
Author(s) : S. Varada, et al.
Filename: draft-ietf-ip
FYI, in case you didn't see this on IETF announce. Please try to make sure
your ID submitted to the working group conform to the this.
There is a script available at:
http://ietf.levkowetz.com/tools/idnits/
that you might find useful.
Bob
From: The IESG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: IETF-Announce:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Pekka Savola;
>
> > There is only marginal value in
> > ND using multicast (compared to broadcast), as the typical number of
> > nodes per link is so low that broadcast storms are not a real problem.
>
> >>The solution has been never bother to have sta
hello
why don't we use IPv4 compatible IPv6 adresses instead of ipv4mappedipv6 adresses to realise compatibility between applications in ipv4 and ipv6?
thanks
Yahoo! Mail : votre e-mail personnel et gratuit qui vous suit partout !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail
Dialoguez en direct avec vos amis
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Mohacsi Janos;
>
> > I think it is very useful. The DHCP is very heavy in some environment.
>
> ND is very heavy in some MIPv6 environment.
I agree.
>
> Say it to Bob Hinden and others who wrote things like
>
>3.1.1 Neighbor Discovery Extension -
Hi,
Can we allow Ipv6
Tunnel6 destination to be configured
as the LinkLocal address.?
Since the scope of the
LinkLocal is just with in one Link,
by specifying the tunnel6
destination address as linklocal we can't get on
which link the destination address lies on ?
> I first would like to know your opinion, if any, on my latest question
> (in the separate message). If we choose option 1 (i.e., basically do
> nothing on this), we still might want to clarify what "match the
> prefix" means to avoid possible confusion.
I think we should clarify this. The word
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> George Gross;
>
> Hi,
>
> > There have been several reliable multicast mechanisms discussed on MANET,
>
> Reliable multicast works over mostly reliable multicast transport.
>
> However, in this case of congested WLAN, multicast/broadcast
> infrastruc
10 matches
Mail list logo
