Re: [psg.com #256] Eliminate random delay in RS transmission

2004-07-20 Thread James Kempf
Looks fine to me. jak - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 12:54 AM Subject: [psg.com #256] Eliminate random delay in RS transmission Issue: --- This issue was raised in order to speed movement detection fo

[psg.com #250] Reception of prefix option with prefix length > 64

2004-07-20 Thread rt+ipv6-2461bis
This issue was discussed in some detail. I've done the following: - Clarified the prefix length field in 4.6.2 - Added clarifications to the second last paragraph in 6.3.4. Text in 4.6.2: Prefix Length 8-bit unsigned integer. The number of leading bits in the Prefix th

[psg.com #250] Reception of prefix option with prefix length > 64

2004-07-20 Thread rt+ipv6-2461bis
This issue was discussed in some detail. I've done the following: - Clarified the prefix length field in 4.6.2 - Added clarifications to the second last paragraph in 6.3.4. Text in 4.6.2: Prefix Length 8-bit unsigned integer. The number of leading bits in the Prefix th

[psg.com #256] Eliminate random delay in RS transmission

2004-07-20 Thread rt+ipv6-2461bis
Issue: --- This issue was raised in order to speed movement detection for mobile nodes. The random delay added before sending router solicitation slows down movement detection significantly. In Seoul, we agreed to allow the removal of this delay after handovers. Suggestion: --- The

[psg.com #256] Eliminate random delay in RS transmission

2004-07-20 Thread rt+ipv6-2461bis
Issue: --- This issue was raised in order to speed movement detection for mobile nodes. The random delay added before sending router solicitation slows down movement detection significantly. In Seoul, we agreed to allow the removal of this delay after handovers. Suggestion: --- The