Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Nordmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 2:15 AM
> To: Soliman, Hesham
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Link MTU restriction in 2461
>
>
> Soliman, Hesham wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Th
Soliman, Hesham wrote:
Hi,
The following comment was received from Elwyn Davies:
S6.3.4: (next to last para on p49): The restriction in setting the LinkMTU to be not greater than the default value specified in the link type specific document is odd and actually inconsistent with the statement
Hi,
The following comment was received from Elwyn Davies:
S6.3.4: (next to last para on p49): The restriction in setting the LinkMTU to
be not greater than the default value specified in the link type specific document
is odd and actually inconsistent with the statements in RFC2590
Title: Comments for rc2461bis
Elwyn,
Thanks
for your detailed review.
Sorry
for the late response, comments inline. I addressed all editorials.
BTW,
I'd appreciate it if you could respond in text format.
Substantive comments: S2.2 and S3: The note after the NBMA
definition says
Issue description:
An NA with O=0, S=0, and no LLAO can cause neighbor cache entries to be
marked STALE. This will cause NUD to be performed on the address. See
section 7.2.5.
=> This was a simple editorial change in 7.2.5.
Starting from the third paragraph, this is how section
7.2.5 now reads:
Issue description:
An NA with O=0, S=0, and no LLAO can cause neighbor cache entries to be
marked STALE. This will cause NUD to be performed on the address. See
section 7.2.5.
=> This was a simple editorial change in 7.2.5.
Starting from the third paragraph, this is how section
7.2.5 now reads:
Subject: State diagram does not consider NA with S=1 O = 0
Issue description:
>From Peter Grubmair:
In the state diagram in RFC2461-bis
in Appendic C, page 79, the event of receiving
a NA with solicitated = 1 and Override = 0
in state DELAY is not handled.
To my understanding the same
Subject: State diagram does not consider NA with S=1 O = 0
Issue description:
>From Peter Grubmair:
In the state diagram in RFC2461-bis
in Appendic C, page 79, the event of receiving
a NA with solicitated = 1 and Override = 0
in state DELAY is not handled.
To my understanding the same
