On Sat, 30 Oct 2004, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the IP Version 6 Working Group WG to
consider the following document:
- 'Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses '
as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on
Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Bob Hinden wrote:
> >> So, are you requiring that BGP will have to have a
> configuration knob
> >> to to special-case fc00::/7? (This cannot be done using
> the typical
> >> route-map/policy statements, because it has to be on by
> default and
> >>
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Bob Hinden wrote:
So, are you requiring that BGP will have to have a configuration knob to to
special-case fc00::/7? (This cannot be done using the typical
route-map/policy statements, because it has to be on by default and not
interfere with the operators configuring their
Pekka,
At 07:22 AM 11/12/2004, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Tony Hain wrote:
replace with:
'The behavior of exterior routing protocol sessions between administrative
routing regions MUST be to ignore receipt of and not advertise the FC00::/7
prefix. A network operator MAY specifically c
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > ...
> > replace with:
> > 'The behavior of exterior routing protocol sessions between
> administrative
> > routing regions MUST be to ignore receipt of and not advertise the
> FC00::/7
> > prefix. A network operator MAY specifically configure prefixes longer
> than
> >
Pekka Savola wrote:
> So, are you requiring that BGP will have to have a configuration knob
> to to special-case fc00::/7? (This cannot be done using the typical
> route-map/policy statements, because it has to be on by default and
> not interfere with the operators configuring their own policy.)
>
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Tony Hain wrote:
replace with:
'The behavior of exterior routing protocol sessions between administrative
routing regions MUST be to ignore receipt of and not advertise the FC00::/7
prefix. A network operator MAY specifically configure prefixes longer than
FC00::/7 for inter-si
Tony Hain wrote:
During a bar discussion very late last night an issue was raised about lack
of clarity, but I am sure we need to put more thought into the remedy than I
will suggest. In any case, the issue is that by leaving the filtering action
as an operational topic we invite restraint of trade
Tony,
At 02:49 PM 11/11/2004, Tony Hain wrote:
During a bar discussion very late last night an issue was raised about lack
of clarity, but I am sure we need to put more thought into the remedy than I
will suggest. In any case, the issue is that by leaving the filtering action
as an operational topi
