Hi
Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
Anyone proposed until now to update RFC2464 "IPv6 over Ethernet
Networks"? If not, I'd like to propose updating the following text:
An IPv6 packet with a multicast destination address DST,
consisting
of the sixteen octets DST[1] through D
> Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>
> > Anyone proposed until now to update RFC2464 "IPv6 over Ethernet
> > Networks"? If not, I'd like to propose updating the following text:
> >
> > > An IPv6 packet with a multicast destination address DST,
> consisting
> > > of the sixteen octets DST[1] through D
Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> Anyone proposed until now to update RFC2464 "IPv6 over Ethernet
> Networks"? If not, I'd like to propose updating the following text:
>
> > An IPv6 packet with a multicast destination address DST, consisting
> > of the sixteen octets DST[1] through DST[16], is transm
> Oops -
>
> This document obsoletes RFC 2463 [RFC2463] and *updates*
> RFC 2780 [RFC-2780].
>
> With that proviso, yes!
Oops ! Sorry about that :)
> Okay, I'll await that.
There is another thread already going on about the second
comment. I would appreciate your comments to that thread
too
Hello,
Anyone proposed until now to update RFC2464 "IPv6 over Ethernet
Networks"? If not, I'd like to propose updating the following text:
An IPv6 packet with a multicast destination address DST, consisting
of the sixteen octets DST[1] through DST[16], is transmitted to the
Ethernet multicast ad
Tuesday, March 8, 2005
0900-1130
---
-Scribes?
- Agenda Bashing Haberman 04 Minutes
- Document Status Haberman 01 Minute
http://www.innovationslab.net/~brian/IETF62/IPv6/IPv6DocumentStatus.html
- Addressi
All,
The chairs are looking for volunteers to act as minute-takers and
jabber scribes. Please let us know of your willingness to act in one
of these capacities.
Regards,
Brian & Bob
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
