It probably should, although the title is fairly clear. 1888 now shows as
Historic in the index. But its true update is presumably going to be
draft-gray-rfc1888bis
Brian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This may seem a little petty, but based on the abstract and title of this
one, shouldn't the line
This may seem a little petty, but based on the abstract and title of this
one, shouldn't the line
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:None
be changed from none to 1888?
Eric
> Original Message
> Subject: RFC 4048 on RFC 1888 Is Obsolete
> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:20:00 -0700
