Fernando,
> A few comments on this text:
>
> * I have not read the latsts update of the IPsec specs. Do
> they know state
> it clearly that if you're using IPsec, you should drop those
> ICMP messages
> that arrive without IPsec authentication? (If not, IPsec won't help).
The new IPsec Secur
Firstly, when we were developing RFC 3697, we were told very forcefully
by the WG to remove use cases from the draft and simply to define
generic "boundary" semantics. I think exactly the same should apply to
this draft, so all the references to 6LSA should be removed. Then we'll
be able to see mor
*>
*> It probably should, although the title is fairly clear. 1888 now shows as
*> Historic in the index. But its true update is presumably going to be
*> draft-gray-rfc1888bis
*>
*> Brian
*>
*> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*> > This may seem a little petty, but based on the
