>
> > I don't understand this use case. Assuming I have a router
> > and it's manual says type in
> > http://de0/
> >
>
I guess in that case that would be a doc error from
that vendor. I would expect the doc to say something like
http://<"name of your nic">
>
> A ve
>
> So, I guess the appropriate next step for this work is to
> make consensus on this, which mostly equals to my question -1:
>
> -1. are we okay with forcing URL/URI parsers to understand the
> detailed semantics of the scoped address syntax and to strip the
> zone ID (+ delimit
JINMEI wrote:
I generally agree with the sense of the proposed text. Thanks for the
proposal.
In the context of rfc2462bis, however, I'm afraid the suggested text
may carry too strong an implication. That is, it will explicitly
affect existing implementations by specifying a concrete behavior wit
