Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
13.16% | 10 | 16.72% |78913 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
14.47% | 11 | 13.12% |61930 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
14.47% | 11 | 11.86% |55980 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10.53% |8 | 10.21% |481
Look, I'm not advocating that every device run DHCPv6. I think we're all
on the same page here - we want some indication of whether to run or not
run DHCP, but that is only an indication not a hard requirement. I, as
the owner/administrator of a device, should be able to explicitly
configure the de
Soliman, Hesham wrote:
Hi Bernie,
> > => You can try, but my concern is about how often you're
> going to try.
> > If there are bits that say whether you should try or not and those
> > bits are not set (i.e. no DHCP server in the network), why
> > would you try?
>
> This means that the wi
Bib Hinden writes:
> >This means that the STP-running sub-cloud need to be P-bit
transparent,
> right?
>
> Yes, that is my understanding. I think the draft is consistent with
> this. That is, a ND proxy implements either the P-bit (choice a) or
the
> STP (choice b) modes, but not both. In STP m
On Fri, 20 May 2005, Bob Hinden wrote:
Also, I am not sure I understand what the problem is regarding knowing when
to try using DHCPv6. For practical purposes, if there isn't a router present
(indicated by the RAs it sends) is very unlikely that there will be a DHCPv6
server either (or it won'
