Re: Comments sought: draft-arunt-ipv6-multicast-filtering-rules-00.txt

2005-06-06 Thread Arun Thulasi
Hello Hoerdt, Do bear with me for the delayed reply. Do find my reply to you inline. Hi Arun, Thanks for this work, I think it can be very useful for multicast application writers. Here are my comments : Section 3: You say that the current behavior is implementation specific, could you give

Re: [dhcwg] RE: purpose of m/o bit

2005-06-06 Thread Erik Nordmark
Bound, Jim wrote: But it is possible to change the meaning of A=0 to mean use dhc if you have it. Also multiple prefixes can be provided. L and A are orthogonal. If you set L and not A all that was stated is use these for link knowlege but not for autoconfigure. But the fact that the A

RFC 4087 on IP Tunnel MIB

2005-06-06 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4087 Title: IP Tunnel MIB Author(s): D. Thaler Status: Standards Track Date: June 2005 Mailbox:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pages: 25

RE: [dhcwg] RE: purpose of m/o bit

2005-06-06 Thread Bound, Jim
Bound, Jim wrote: But it is possible to change the meaning of A=0 to mean use dhc if you have it. Also multiple prefixes can be provided. L and A are orthogonal. If you set L and not A all that was stated is use these for link knowlege but not for autoconfigure. But the