> On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 08:16:50 +0300,
> Markku Savela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Possibly, however from Section 2.5.3 "The Loopback Address" it says:
>>
>> The unicast address 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1 is called the loopback address.
>> It may be used by a node to send an IPv6 packet to itself.
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:56:27 -0700,
> Bob Hinden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> All interfaces are required to have at least one link-local unicast
>> address (see Section 2.8 for additional required addresses).
>>
>> (this should be generally interpreted that even the loopback interface
Jinmei,
At 04:02 PM 06/16/2005,
=?iso-2022-jp?Q?ext_JINMEI_Tatuya_/_=1B=24B=3F=40L=40C=23=3AH=1 wrote:
This should be way too delayed for ipv6-addr-arch-v4 (already approved
by the IESG), but...
Agreed!
I happen to find one possible clarification which could have been in
the latest address
This should be way too delayed for ipv6-addr-arch-v4 (already approved
by the IESG), but...
I happen to find one possible clarification which could have been in
the latest address architecture document. In a previous discussion
back in 2002, we seem to have agreed the loopback interface does not