Re: link-local address on loopback interface

2005-06-16 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 08:16:50 +0300, > Markku Savela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> Possibly, however from Section 2.5.3 "The Loopback Address" it says: >> >> The unicast address 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1 is called the loopback address. >> It may be used by a node to send an IPv6 packet to itself.

Re: link-local address on loopback interface

2005-06-16 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:56:27 -0700, > Bob Hinden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> All interfaces are required to have at least one link-local unicast >> address (see Section 2.8 for additional required addresses). >> >> (this should be generally interpreted that even the loopback interface

Re: link-local address on loopback interface

2005-06-16 Thread Bob Hinden
Jinmei, At 04:02 PM 06/16/2005, =?iso-2022-jp?Q?ext_JINMEI_Tatuya_/_=1B=24B=3F=40L=40C=23=3AH=1 wrote: This should be way too delayed for ipv6-addr-arch-v4 (already approved by the IESG), but... Agreed! I happen to find one possible clarification which could have been in the latest address

link-local address on loopback interface

2005-06-16 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
This should be way too delayed for ipv6-addr-arch-v4 (already approved by the IESG), but... I happen to find one possible clarification which could have been in the latest address architecture document. In a previous discussion back in 2002, we seem to have agreed the loopback interface does not