Re: [GLOBAL-V6] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-00.txt

2005-07-16 Thread Thomas Narten
Ito-san, You raise some good questions. I have been observing the current discussion on reviewing the current policies and address allocation practices. Then, I felt that we should resort what a real issue is. Why do we need to change HD-Ratio? To ensure that we really have plenty of IPv6

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-00.txt

2005-07-16 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
I tend to agree with this. I see situations for assigning a /128 when a unique device is connected, which is not going to route anything else, but once it has other interfaces (which is the most common case and will become more and more often) ... Regards, Jordi De: Tony Hain [EMAIL

Weekly posting summary for ipv6@ietf.org

2005-07-16 Thread Rob Austein
Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 9.30% |4 | 14.37% |40034 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9.30% |4 | 11.54% |32136 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11.63% |5 | 8.13% |22646 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6.98% |3 | 9.33% |