> the change to APPENDIX C should cover the case of
> an unsolicited ND message does not contain source/target LLAO,
> AND the receiving node does not have a neighbor cache entry for
> the source/target
> (there are two conditions for a single 'case')
>
> Is this now clear
Hi.
Sorry for the silence.. I have been on an extended holiday jaunt and am
just catching up.
As one of those who commented on the current version, just to say that I
am happy with the proposed resolution, but it is probably appropriate to
add a security note as proposed by Jeroen Massar as
