RE: Process id in UDP/TCP mibs?

2006-05-18 Thread Bernie Volz \(volz\)
Yes, by all means improve the description of the item. I had already suggested a rewording, but it can definitely use more tweaking. I guess there is also the question as to what to return in cases where there are either multiple processes "using" the endpoint or where the process no longer exists

Re: Process id in UDP/TCP mibs?

2006-05-18 Thread Erik Nordmark
Bernie Volz (volz) wrote: Obviously that is less than desirable, but just because some platforms may be unable to provide useful information doesn't mean we just deprecate it for all. Implementers of SNMP agents for this MIB will thus need to decide whether they return a value for this item or no