Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
8.57% |3 | 13.11% |32132 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5.71% |2 | 11.45% |28052 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8.57% |3 | 7.63% |18691 | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8.57% |3 | 7.51% |183
Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> ...
> I would be happy if I knew about deployments being cooked that
> required /64 per user, let alone anything more. I still have a hard
> time imagining what technology will deployed at most sites that
> _require_ separate subnets, but I am trying to be generous and
On 14-jul-2006, at 21:05, Manfredi, Albert E wrote:
[...]
On this point, unless you're speaking of NATs (which I though would be
discouraged with v6), doesn't it make a lot of sense to use the same
address prefix to reach the subnet outside and inside the home router?
Huh???
I have no idea h
