Mark Desterdick is out of the office.

2006-07-17 Thread desterdick
I will be out of the office starting 07/17/2006 and will not return until 07/21/2006. I will respond to your message when I return. IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf

Re: draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-02.txt

2006-07-17 Thread Jason Schiller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > It > should be stressed that having different prefix sizes in the market > place leads to higher operational cost because moving from one ISP to > another then requires doing more work than just change a fixed number > of high bits in all p

Re: draft-narten-ipv6-3177bis-48boundary-02.txt

2006-07-17 Thread Jason Schiller ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I would like to echo some comments by David Conrad and Mark Smith. a /48 or 65,536 /64 subnets does seem like an overly large assignment to a residential user. IMHO moving the boundary to a /56 is completely missing the boat on what the actual problem is. We discovered that classful addresses