I agree that the issues mentioned in the draft
draft-madanapalli-ipv6-periodic-rtr-advts-00.txt
should not be blocking 2461bis, and should be moved forward.
But I think the draft is applicable for certain category of networks
(Cellular Networks) so it may not be a good idea to put the same
Hello Rémi,
Thanks for your time reviewing V04 of the address selection API.
Julien L. has already addressed your comments. Here are some
additional comments.
The proposed solution of extending the getaddrinfo structure (at the end)
is designed to keep ABI consistency in mind.
The extended
This is all a matter of being consistent with the Advanced IPv6 API, and
with the established practice in POSIX world. Pretty much every
setsockopt uses int, unless it has very peculiar reason not to do so.
Using something else will only confuse people, and add a (minor) extra
implementation
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 07:45:29PM -0800, Samita Chakrabarti wrote :
The proposed solution of extending the getaddrinfo structure (at the end)
is designed to keep ABI consistency in mind.
The extended ai_eflags will not break ABI boundaries unless the library
design is broken.
