Hi Ralph and Thomas,
Just updating the doc for final (hopefully!) submission.
A couple of conclusions from the discussion below are unlear to me. So your
responses will help me clarify the new document.
Substantive/editorial: I'm confused by the statements in
section 3.2,
Hesham Soliman wrote:
Hi Ralph and Thomas,
Just updating the doc for final (hopefully!) submission. A couple of
conclusions from the discussion below are unlear to me. So your
responses will help me clarify the new document.
Hi Hesham, please allow me to interfere, splitting the thread to a
Ah, right, thanks for the pointer. Just for my own
enlightenment, is there
a reason to advertise a prefix that has all three of L, A
and R not set;
i.e., a prefix not used for IPv6 mobility, not used for
SLAAC and not
on-link?
= I can't think of a useful application that
