Re: new NDP option or new RA option

Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> It's expired. Try >> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-haberman-ipv6-ra-flags-option-00.txt > > The draft describes an option to be included in the RA. However, > section 4 calls it a "NDP Expansion Option", meaning this option could > be inc

Re: new NDP option or new RA option (was: WG Request: Adopt draft-haberman-ipv6-ra-flags-option-00.txt)

Brian E Carpenter wrote: It's expired. Try http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-haberman-ipv6-ra-flags-option-00.txt The draft describes an option to be included in the RA. However, section 4 calls it a "NDP Expansion Option", meaning this option could be included in - other than RA - NDP messages(?