On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Hemant Singh \(shemant\) wrote:
Folks,
When will a URL be available for this new IPv6 Maintenance WG? Will this
new WG have a new mailer to send emails to or will the ipv6@ietf.org
mailer continue to be used for the new WG? If a new mailer is created,
will people subscribed
Le vendredi 10 août 2007, ather zaidi a écrit :
I am a final year engineering student in India, as part of our final
year project we are working on some modifications in ipv6 header
format .
You're quite a bit late in the game. The IPv6 header format has been
frozen over 10 years ago. Also,
IETF IPv6 Community,
Please review the -02 version of our I-D. In particular, we'd like
reviewers to focus on our proposed changes to 2461bis.
We would like to specify on-link vs. off-link determination more clearly
for ALL IPv6 hosts. On-link vs. off-link determines data forwarding and
Hello Hemant,
There is no DHCPv6 mechabism to explicitly transmit router/gateway information.
Regards,
John
##
John Jason Brzozowski, CISSP, RHCT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
484-994-6787
##
-Original Message-
From: Hemant Singh (shemant) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you John.
Has your working group considered adding this as a DHCPv6 option? If the
on-link router is not configured to transmit RAs, a DHCPv6 option advertising
the default gateway would be helpful in populating the routing table.
Best Regards,
Tammy
-Original Message-
From:
If this is true, the DoD is sadly mistaken. But, I think you are not
understanding the statement correctly. The quoted statement says nothing
about RAs - it talks about discovering interface addresses.
Interface addresses are completely SEPARATE from routing information.
Please do NOT confuse the
