Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> IPv6 specifications and implementations without DHCPv6 have been
> around for the better part of a decade,
Given that IPv6 has never really been deployed, we should rather use
OSI, because it has longer history of specification and implementation.
> so requiring D
On Aug 13, 2007, at 09:10, David W. Hankins wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:51:09PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達
哉 wrote:
In any event, I hear that some DHCPv6 guys are planning to make a new
draft that covers this topic. So I think it's better to hold off for
now and wait for the document, ra
On 14-aug-2007, at 12:38, tom.petch wrote:
Which got me thinking: wouldn't it be great if a single message from
a host could serve as both a router solicitation and a DHCP solicit
message?
Yes, as long as the router 'server' and the DHCP server get their
act together
and present a single co
- Original Message -
From: "Iljitsch van Beijnum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bernie Volz ((volz))" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Alexandru Petrescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
; "John Jason Brzozowski (JJMB)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: pre
Iljitsch van Beijnum writes:
> On 13-aug-2007, at 19:25, Bernie Volz ((volz)) wrote:
>
> > DHCPv6 messages are generally small and don't require a lot of back
> > and
> > further. I really don't understand why people are objecting to one or
> > two request/reply exchanges (only the request of wh
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:51:09PM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
> In any event, I hear that some DHCPv6 guys are planning to make a new
> draft that covers this topic. So I think it's better to hold off for
> now and wait for the document, rather than continue this thread
> with keeping poss
Iljitsch van Beijnum writes:
> On 13-aug-2007, at 17:38, James Carlson wrote:
> > There's a problem with that idea. There's no guarantee in any
> > deployment that the DHCPv6 server is actually the definitive source of
> > information about the prefixes that are on the link. Routers are
> > suppo
