On 24-okt-2007, at 17:03, Jeroen Massar wrote:
There are other differences. You forgot anycast and you forgot to
mention that only
Since when is anycast an exclusive IPv6 property? Anycast is a routing
trick. Nothing more, nothing less.
People have been using this for ages already.
Have you read the analysis pieces on how, Powerpoint doomed
the Columbia (space shuttle)?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/2
9/AR2005082901444.html
No but I have read the original report of the investigating committee
into the Challenger disaster and I remember
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The more that you require the other person to learn and understand, the
harder it is to convince them of something or displace a mistaken idea.
Have you read the analysis pieces on how, Powerpoint doomed the
Columbia (space shuttle)?
Maybe a wiki or other online / real-time solution would be
best, but this will require someone to manage it and people
who have a clue to monitor (moderate) it, and most of these
people are either doing it or are working on improving it (
i.e. writing RFCs).
I think this is the reason
Hello All,
I have a question regarding two examples in section 10.2 of RFC 3484 for
default destination address selection.
The Default Policy Table is defined as:
PrefixPrecedence Label
::1/128 50 0
::/0 40 1
Hello All,
The revelation that ::/0 covers all addresses by default still leaves questions
unanswered for me.
Example 3:
Candidate Source Addresses: 2001::2 or fe80::1 or 10.1.2.4
Destination Address List: 2001::1 or 10.1.2.3
Result: 2001::1 (src 2001::2) then 10.1.2.3 (src 10.1.2.4)
At Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:40:24 -0600,
Leino, Tammy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
::/0 is going to cover all addresses that aren't covered explicitly
by some other prefix in the Default Policy Table, right?
Yes.
(Continuing to your next question)
At Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:19:36 -0600,
Leino, Tammy
