On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 12:06:44AM +0100, ?? wrote:
> > However, there may be
> > situations where hexadecimal representation is chosen to meet certain
> > needs. Addressing those needs is out of the scope of this document.
>
> It's rather vague, and I think the recentl
6man folks,
If anyone hasn't compared the diffs between this -06 and -05 version
(this was in the LastCall that expired today), I'd like to point out
that the technical content of the doc hasn't changed. Just the top
header has an extra line of "Updates: 4861 (if approved)". This was as
per Brian
Hello,
(don't mind if any copies of this message arrive; I'm trying to wrestle
Gmane into sending to this list)
писал в своём письме Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:30:01
+0300:
Title : A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation
Author(s) : S. Kawamura, M
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
Title : IPv6 Subnet Model: the Relationship between Links and
Subnet Prefixes
Author(s) : H. Singh, et al.
