On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:19:10 -0800, Dan Wing dw...@cisco.com wrote:
I'm a bit worried about this. If e.g. the host is 100ms (RTT) away and
10 combinations work, you may end up creating TCP state (and getting
syn-acks back) on the destination host for 10 connections,
Are there servers that
Rémi Denis-Courmont allegedly wrote on 12/02/2009 5:17 AM:
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 22:19:10 -0800, Dan Wing dw...@cisco.com wrote:
Are there servers that don't use SYN-cookies now-a-days?
IIRC, recent Linux kernel version have SYN-cookies disabled by default as
they were found to make things
-Original Message-
From: Rémi Denis-Courmont [mailto:r...@remlab.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 2:18 AM
To: Dan Wing
Cc: Stig Venaas; Fred Baker;
draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-...@tools.ietf.org;
draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-considerati...@tools.ietf.org;
IETF IPv6
Hi Bob,
-Original Message-
From: Bob Hinden [mailto:bob.hin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 5:38 PM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: Bob Hinden; Thomas Narten; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: New draft on Stub Router Advertisements in IPv6
NeighborDiscovery
Fred,
In my
Hi Brian,
-Original Message-
From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 7:18 PM
To: Templin, Fred L
Cc: Thomas Narten; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: New draft on Stub Router Advertisements in IPv6
NeighborDiscovery
The NBMA link
Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote:
I personally think RFC 4389 is well shaken out for a doc - as we say in
our new short note, the only reason they didn't make the ND Proxy doc a
Standards Track doc because ND Proxy did not support SEND extensions.
I definitely had other concerns around RFC 4389
