Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-06.txt

2010-02-21 Thread Doug Barton
On 02/21/10 11:01, Brian E Carpenter wrote: On 2010-02-21 19:38, Doug Barton wrote: On 02/20/10 22:30, Antonio Querubin wrote: On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Doug Barton wrote: 4.2.4. Exception to the :: Shortening Rule When it is necessary to record an address with consecutive 16 bit 0 fields

RE: AD review of draft-ietf-6man-subnet-model

2010-02-21 Thread Hemant Singh (shemant)
6man folks, Here is the reply we sent to Jari on Friday wrt to his review below. Hi Jari, Thanks for the review. We agree with your first comment and will change the sentence to: Hosts MUST verify that on-link information is still valid after IPv6 interface re-initialization.

RE: [Fwd: I-D Action:draft-carpenter-6man-flow-update-00.txt]

2010-02-21 Thread Sheng Jiang
This may seem a bit unexpected, but after working on draft-carpenter-flow-ecmp (just updated) and working with my student Qinwen Hu on some aspects of the flow label, it seemed like time for another look at the flow label standard, and Sheng Jiang was having similar thoughts.

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-06.txt

2010-02-21 Thread Seiichi Kawamura
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Doug I'm willing to take Brian's suggestions on this one. Thank you very much for the suggestion though, and also the editorial tips. Regards, Seiichi Doug Barton wrote: On 02/21/10 11:01, Brian E Carpenter wrote: On 2010-02-21 19:38, Doug

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-06.txt

2010-02-21 Thread Seiichi Kawamura
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Brian For URIs containing IPv6 address literals, [RFC3986] MUST be followed, as well as the rules in this document. Couldn't be put any more clear than this. Thank you. Regards, Seiichi Brian E Carpenter wrote: Hi, I'm generally