On May 17, 2010, at 6:18 AM, JP Vasseur wrote:
Dear all,
This is to re-activate our discussion during the last IETF
meetings. Feed-back are very welcome since we would like to move
forward as soon as possible, this proposed extension is indeed
critical for RPL to move forward.
Many Thanks.
JP and Jonathan.
I strongly support this draft; it is a make-or-break extension,
without which RPL will not be an effective protocol. There is
extensive experimental evidence from many LLN deployments and
testbeds that the mechanisms it enables (datapath validation) are
critical.
I think Jonathan has done an excellent job of narrowly defining what
the option can do: containing it within a RPL domain addresses most
of the major concerns with hop-by-hop options.
Phil
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
