Hello, what do you think of this draft?
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yhb-6man-nd-improvement/
Abstract
This document describes the improvement to neighbor discovery. When
an IPv6 address is deleted on a node, the node will send a neighbor
advertisement with a Deleted flag set
Hello, what do you think of this draft?
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag/
Abstract
The temporary addresses described by RFC4941 makes it more difficult
for eavesdroppers and other information collectors to track the
hosts,but also bring trouble to the
On Feb 24, 2011, at 6:19 AM, Yu Hua bing wrote:
Hello, what do you think of this draft?
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag/
I don't see why using A=0 in the PIO is insufficient for this purpose.
That said, I also think a huge flaw in the draft is that existing
Le jeudi 24 février 2011 16:18:04 Yu Hua bing, vous avez écrit :
Hello, what do you think of this draft?
It is far too easy for a node of the subnet to hijack an address by spoofing
the deleted flag...
Besides, nodes often learn that they're going off-link too late to send the
deletion notice
On 24 Feb 2011 at 09:35:12 -0800, James Woodyatt wrote:
On Feb 24, 2011, at 6:19 AM, Yu Hua bing wrote:
Hello, what do you think of this draft?
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag/
I don't see why using A=0 in the PIO is insufficient for this purpose.
User
