Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-exthdr-02.txt

2011-04-16 Thread Hing-Kam (Kam) Lam
Any update on this work? I thought we were very close to the WG LC last time and the new version is addressing all the points raised. If Yes, can we please move this forward. Kam On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > Hi John, > > On 11-03-15 04:15 PM, John Leslie wrote: >> >>

Re: PMTU blackhole detection

2011-04-16 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, Philip Homburg wrote: PMTU blackhole detection seemed so obvious to me, that I never bothered to find out if there was an RFC specifying that it should be done. is what you're looking for I guess? -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...

Re: PMTU blackhole detection

2011-04-16 Thread Philip Homburg
In your letter dated Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:28:53 +0100 you wrote: >On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 11:17 +0200, Philip Homburg wrote: >> >> PMTU blackhole detection seemed so obvious to me, that I never bothered to >> find out if there was an RFC specifying that it should be done. > >Conversely... > >It's alw

PMTU blackhole detection

2011-04-16 Thread Philip Homburg
PMTU blackhole detection seemed so obvious to me, that I never bothered to find out if there was an RFC specifying that it should be done. That is, until I encountered an admin said that he didn't do PMTU blackhole detection because end-users should just fix their systems (the irony is that this c