A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Rationale for update to the IPv6 flow label
specification
Author(s) : S. Amante, et al.
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF.
Title : IPv6 Flow Label Specification
Author(s) : S. Amante, et al.
Filename:
Hi,
All three flow label drafts have now been updated. They can be
found conveniently at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search/?name=draft-ietf-6man-flowactiveDrafts=on
I will shortly send messages explaining how we've dealt with the final set
of WGLC comments.
Regards
Brian + co-authors
On 2011-04-06 05:40, Thomas Narten wrote:
Here are my detailed comments on the document. I did chat with Brian
directly in Prague about these points as well. Overall, I support this
document. But I think the wording in places needs another round of
revision.
A flow is a sequence of
On 2011-04-06 06:09, Thomas Narten wrote:
Here are my comments on this document.
My main issue is that it continues to assert that flow labels are
required to be pseudo random. I am not convinced that is necessary and
I think it makes things more complex than necessary.
Emphasis changed to
On 2011-04-06 05:45, Thomas Narten wrote:
Looking at the revised document, here are some additional comments.
One lightweight approach to ECMP or LAG is this: if there are N
equally good paths to choose from, then form a modulo(N) hash
[RFC2991] from a consistent set of fields in
