On 06/01/2011 02:13 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
In summary: the algorithm suggested in the Appendix to
draft-ietf-6man-flow-3697bis-04 doesn't perform very well
on real packets, and I have an improved version to suggest.
Sorry if I'm missing something: Any reasons for which you chose a
Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com writes:
Ray,
Without going into details: how about turning this into
draft-hunter-v6ops-something and having the debate over in v6ops?
I think that would be useful, personally.
Actually, let me suggest something else.
Before spending a whole
On Jun 1, 2011, at 4:42 PM 6/1/11, Thomas Narten wrote:
Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com writes:
Ray,
Without going into details: how about turning this into
draft-hunter-v6ops-something and having the debate over in v6ops?
I think that would be useful, personally.
Fernando,
My to-do list included running your algorithm against the
same datasets. However, I just looked at your draft again and
it seems to be underspecified - you do not define what functions
F and G are. And I think it's stateful, because of the statement
if(three-tuple is unique).
All we
Hi, Brian,
On 06/01/2011 07:09 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
My to-do list included running your algorithm against the
same datasets. However, I just looked at your draft again and
it seems to be underspecified - you do not define what functions
F and G are.
To some extent, this was
On 2011-06-02 11:19, Fernando Gont wrote:
Hi, Brian,
On 06/01/2011 07:09 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
My to-do list included running your algorithm against the
same datasets. However, I just looked at your draft again and
it seems to be underspecified - you do not define what functions
F
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 14:20 -0300, Fernando Gont wrote:
* IPv6 Router Advertisement Guard (RA-Guard) Evasion, available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-v6ops-ra-guard-evasion-00.txt
Section 1, second para: of identifying should be to identify
Section 1, third para: had so far been
