Re: [v6ops] Question regarding Ra-Guard evasion (ND and extensio headers)

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 10:45:37 +0930 Mark Smith wrote: > Hi Fernando, > > > On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:51:12 -0300 > Fernando Gont wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Some folks have expressed (both on-list and off-list) that they would > > prefer a less agressive solution for the RA-Guard evasion vulnerabil

Re: [v6ops] Question regarding Ra-Guard evasion (ND and extensio headers)

Hi Fernando, On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 18:51:12 -0300 Fernando Gont wrote: > Hi, > > Some folks have expressed (both on-list and off-list) that they would > prefer a less agressive solution for the RA-Guard evasion vulnerability. > So I'd like to hear comments about the possible alternatives.. > >

AD review of draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header

I have reviewed this draft. I have a number of comments, most of which are at this point questions and discussion items. The comments are included below in three categories: technical comments, editorial comments, and comments relating to feedback from other people that may not been fully hand

Question regarding Ra-Guard evasion (ND and extensio headers)

Hi, Some folks have expressed (both on-list and off-list) that they would prefer a less agressive solution for the RA-Guard evasion vulnerability. So I'd like to hear comments about the possible alternatives.. The current I-Ds (draft-gont-6man-nd-extension-headers and draft-gont-v6ops-ra-guard-ev

I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-03.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. Title : Update to RFC 3484 Default Address Selection for IPv6 Author(s) : Arifumi Matsumoto