Hi,
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:47:28PM +0800, Washam Fan wrote:
Sorry for late response.
Since NS(DAD) traverse the same link, couldn't we just use src MAC of
the received NS(DAD) to identify if the NS is the one sent by the
interface earlier?
Am I missing something?
Yes. Not all the
a completed
algorithm to detect looped back NS(DAD) messages in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hsingh-6man-enhanced-dad-01
[WEG]] It is also worth noting that the authors of draft-asati are working to
incorporate some elements of that draft into the one that Hemant mentions
above, and a
WesG,
Thanks for the update. Chairs of 6man, please expect us to present a
merged document at the Taipei IETF. The asati and hsingh doc teams are
working together to complete a single doc. We will try and publish the
new merged copy in about a week.
Regards,
Hemant
-Original
Hi Lorenzo,
Sorry about the delayed response (and thanks to Hemant for pointing this
out). Pls see inline,
A couple of points that the draft doesn't explain:
- Why can't the node simply retry DAD without the nonce option?
The node could simply do so, however, it wouldn't be able to
Hi,
2011/10/20 Gert Doering g...@space.net:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:47:28PM +0800, Washam Fan wrote:
Sorry for late response.
Since NS(DAD) traverse the same link, couldn't we just use src MAC of
the received NS(DAD) to identify if the NS is the one sent by the
interface earlier?
Hi Hemant,
2011/10/20 Hemant Singh (shemant) shem...@cisco.com:
Washam,
-Original Message-
From: Washam Fan [mailto:washam@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 9:47 AM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant)
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti; Erik Kline; v6...@ietf.org;
