Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt]

2012-03-17 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2012-03-17 19:22, Dave Thaler wrote: > Brian Carpenter writes: > [...] >> Let me be clear. If a local service has (for some reason) both a ULA and a >> non- >> ULA global address, and the host has both, I think the correct default >> behaviour is for the ULA address pair to be used. > > As I p

Re: ULA scope [draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05.txt]

2012-03-17 Thread Kerry Lynn
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Dave Thaler wrote: > Brian Carpenter writes: > [...] >> Let me be clear. If a local service has (for some reason) both a ULA and a >> non- >> ULA global address, and the host has both, I think the correct default >> behaviour is for the ULA address pair to be used

Re: draft-macaulay-6man-packet-stain-00 --- Issues to consider

2012-03-17 Thread Ehud Doron
> > Hello Tyson > > > > Indeed a very good and interesting work!! > > > > I would like to suggest a few issues for you and the WG to consider: > > > > 1. In chapter 5 you proposed the PSDO structure. I think you must > consider the addition of Stain structure and semantics to be part of the