This function results in addresses that:
1. R stable within the same subnet
2. Have different Interface-IDs when moving across networks
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 15, 2012, at 7:30 AM, "Fernando Gont"
mailto:fg...@si6networks.com>> wrote:
Hi, Fred,
On 04/15/2012 05:54 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
That
Hi, Fred,
On 04/15/2012 05:54 AM, Fred Baker wrote:
>> That said, a more general question would be: should we include the
>> (numeric) interface index rather than e.g. a hardware-specific
>> I-D?
>
> Hmmm. I would tend to think that's a small positive integer, which
> isn't all that unique.
Exa
On 04/15/2012 02:07 AM, Christian Huitema wrote:
> You don't really need the EUI64 for the proposal to work. We could
> just as well completely omit the field, and simply use the EUI64 as
> an optional seed for the random number. But there are two
> advantages:
You need to be able to differentiate
