Hi, Ole,
On 05/08/2012 02:42 PM, Ole Trøan wrote:
> The discussion brought up some issues that we will work with the author to
> resolve, in particular:
>
> - The current draft is written to not allow the IETF to create derivative
> works.
>This is incompatible with the IETF standards proce
Sent from my iPad
On May 9, 2012, at 11:54 AM, "Carsten Bormann" wrote:
> Hi Med,
>
> thanks for looking into my review. Let me take this opportunity to reiterate
> that, while I wrote this review for the Applications Area Directorate, it is
> not intended to bear more weight than any othe
Hi Med,
thanks for looking into my review. Let me take this opportunity to reiterate
that, while I wrote this review for the Applications Area Directorate, it is
not intended to bear more weight than any other comment submitted by an
individual during a Last Call.
> Med: There are plenty of a
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5952,
"A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5952&eid=3219
--
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5952,
"A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation".
--
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5952&eid=3218
--
Dear Carsten,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
>-Message d'origine-
>De : Carsten Bormann [mailto:c...@tzi.org]
>Envoyé : dimanche 6 mai 2012 22:58
>À :
>draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format@tools.ietf.or
>g; apps-disc...@ietf.org application-lay
