Re: 6MAN WG [second] Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-01.txt

2012-06-13 Thread Dave Hart
I support advancing draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-01 as a PS. Dave Hart IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -

Re: 6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-nd-extension-headers-03

2012-06-13 Thread Dave Hart
I am in favor of adopting draft-gont-6man-nd-extension-headers-03 as a 6MAN WG document. Dave Hart IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 ---

Re: 6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02

2012-06-13 Thread Dave Hart
I am in favor of adopting draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02 as a 6MAN WG document. Dave Hart IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 -

Re: Last Call: (The Line Identification Destination Option) to Experimental RFC

2012-06-13 Thread Suresh Krishnan
Hi Ran/Med, I will add the reference and publish a new rev at the end of the last call period in addition. Cheers Suresh IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/l

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-6man-dad-proxy-03.txt

2012-06-13 Thread Internet-Drafts
A new Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. Title : Duplicate Address Detection Proxy Author(s) : F. Costa, et al Filename : draft-ietf-6man-dad-proxy P

RE: Last Call: (The Line Identification Destination Option) to Experimental RFC

2012-06-13 Thread RJ Atkinson
On 13th June 2012, Mohamed Boucadair wrote, in part: > > Having the warnings in the draft is good but having a pointer > to a document including a fair and detailed risk analysis is also > valuable and worth to be acknowledged. > > Having that pointer is an "invitation" to people who will depl

draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02

2012-06-13 Thread RJ Atkinson
Hi, I support the 6MAN WG adopting this document -- and also the closely related draft-gont-6man-nd-extension-headers document. The proposals in these two documents are closely related to current work in IPv6 Ops WG to create an IETF specification for an IPv6 Router Advertisement (RA) Guard

Re: 6MAN WG [second] Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-01.txt

2012-06-13 Thread Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
Support Cheers, Rajiv Sent from my Phone On Jun 13, 2012, at 7:08 AM, "Randy Bush" wrote: > i have slogged through it and support publication as ps > > randy > > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Adminis

Re: 6MAN WG [second] Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-01.txt

2012-06-13 Thread Randy Bush
i have slogged through it and support publication as ps randy IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6

6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-nd-extension-headers-03

2012-06-13 Thread Ole Trøan
All, This starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting Title : Security Implications of the Use of IPv6 Extension Headers with IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Author(s) : F. Gont Filename : draft-gont-6man-nd-extension-headers-03 Pages : 13 Date

6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02

2012-06-13 Thread Ole Trøan
All, This starts a 2-week consensus call on adopting Title : Security and Interoperability Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains Author(s) : F. Gont, V. Manral Filename : draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02 Pages : 12 Date

6MAN WG [second] Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-01.txt

2012-06-13 Thread Ole Trøan
All, This message starts a one-week 6MAN Working Group Last Call on advancing: Title : Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Uniform Resource Identifiers Author(s) : Brian Carpenter Robert M. Hinden Filename : draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-01.txt

RE: Last Call: (The Line Identification Destination Option) to Experimental RFC

2012-06-13 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Dear Suresh, Having the warnings in the draft is good but having a pointer to a document including a fair and detailed risk analysis is also valuable and worth to be acknowledged. Having that pointer is an "invitation" to people who will deploy this mechanism (I know some of them who are plann