Re: Conclusion of 6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-nd-extension-headers-03

2012-06-29 Thread Fernando Gont
Hi, Bob, Thanks so much for your timely e-mail. BTW, any take on the result of the other poll (draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain)? (mine is that it received similar support... but ymmv) Thanks! Best regards, Fernando On 06/28/2012 09:47 PM, Bob Hinden wrote: All, Based on the

I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-nd-extension-headers-00.txt

2012-06-29 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. Title : Security Implications of the Use of IPv6 Extension Headers with IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Author(s)

I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-00.txt

2012-06-29 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance Working Group of the IETF. Title : Security and Interoperability Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains Author(s) : Fernando

Re: 6MAN WG Call for adoption draft-gont-6man-oversized-header-chain-02

2012-06-29 Thread Suresh Krishnan
Hi Fernando, On 06/27/2012 10:46 PM, Fernando Gont wrote: On 06/27/2012 10:34 PM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: I read through the draft and I am generally supportive of the sentiment behind the draft. But the draft itself is not at all clear on what constitutes a entire IPv6 header chain. Without