I know it's after the designated end of WGLC, but here's my feedback...
The document appears to call out existing practice in several places, such as
in section 1:
> Some versions of some browsers accept the RFC 4007 syntax for scoped
> IPv6 addresses embedded in URIs, i.e., they have been co
Hello,
I have posted a new draft that calls for an update to RFC2460.
The document proposes to enlist the support of IPv6 hosts in
offloading the burden carried by links that must perform
link-specific fragmentation/reassembly per RFC2460, Section 5:
"IPv6 requires that every link in the inter
